On Mon 22-03-21 14:49:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 22-03-21 15:00:37, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:14:37AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Le'ts Andrea and Mike > > > > > > On Fri 19-03-21 22:24:28, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > > > > userfaultfd_writeprotect() use change_protection() to clear write bit in > > > > page table entries (pte/pmd). So, later write to this virtual address > > > > range causes a page fault, which is then handled by userspace program. > > > > However, change_protection() has no effect when there is no page table > > > > entries associated with that virtual memory range (a newly mapped memory > > > > range). As a result, later access to that memory range causes allocating a > > > > page table entry with write bit still set (due to VM_WRITE flag in > > > > vma->vm_flags). > > > > > > > > Add checks for VM_UFFD_WP in vma->vm_flags when allocating new page table > > > > entry in missing page table entry page fault path. > > > > > > From the above it is not really clear whether this is a usability > > > problem or a bug of the interface. > > > > I'd say it's usability/documentation clarity issue. > > Userspace can register an area with > > > > UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING | UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP > > > > and then it will be notified either when page table has no entry for a > > virtual address or when there is a write to a write protected address. > > Thanks for the clarification! I have suspected this to be the case but > I am not really familiar with the interface to have any strong statement > here. Maybe we want to document this explicitly. Btw. Andrew the patch still seems to be in mmotm. Do you plan to keep it there? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
