Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 12/26] Uprobes: Handle breakpoint and Singlestep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> What if the forking task (current) is in UTASK_BP_HIT state?
> ...
>
> And what if we step into a syscall insn?
> ...

And I guess there would be a lot more problems here. But, looking
at is_prefix_bad() I see the nice comment:

	* opcodes we'll probably never support:
	* 0f - lar, lsl, syscall, clts, sysret, sysenter, sysexit, invd, wbinvd, ud2

This answers my questions.

> Please simply ignore my email if you think everything is fine.

Yep.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]