On 2021/3/23 19:07, Alistair Popple wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 9:26:43 PM AEDT David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 20.03.21 10:36, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> If the zone device page does not belong to un-addressable device memory,
>>> the variable entry will be uninitialized and lead to indeterminate pte
>>> entry ultimately. Fix this unexpectant case and warn about it.
>>
>> s/unexpectant/unexpected/
>>
>>>
>>> Fixes: df6ad69838fc ("mm/device-public-memory: device memory cache
> coherent with CPU")
>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> mm/migrate.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>> index 20a3bf75270a..271081b014cb 100644
>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>> @@ -2972,6 +2972,13 @@ static void migrate_vma_insert_page(struct
> migrate_vma *migrate,
>>>
>>> swp_entry = make_device_private_entry(page, vma->vm_flags &
> VM_WRITE);
>>> entry = swp_entry_to_pte(swp_entry);
>>> + } else {
>>> + /*
>>> + * For now we only support migrating to un-addressable
>>> + * device memory.
>>> + */
>>> + WARN_ON(1);
>>> + goto abort;
>>
>> Fix it by crashing the kernel with panic_on_warn? :)
>>
>> If this case can actual happen, than no WARN_ON() - rather a
>> pr_warn_once(). If this case cannot happen, why do we even care (it's
>> not a fix then)?
>
> There is also already a check for this case in migrate_vma_pages(). The
> problem is it happens after the call to migrate_vma_insert_page(). I wonder if
> instead it would be better just to move the existing check to before that
> call?
>
Yes, sounds good! Many thanks for your advice! :)
> >
> .
>
