On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:09:29 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently we already have pagefault_{disable,enable}() but they're
> nothing more than a glorified preempt_{disable,enable}().
That's not very accurate or useful. Unlike preempt_disable(),
pagefault_disable() will raise the preempt count when CONFIG_PREEMPT=n.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>