Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: recompute min_count when dropping hugetlb_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 19-03-21 15:42:03, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> The routine set_max_huge_pages reduces the number of hugetlb_pages,
> by calling free_pool_huge_page in a loop.  It does this as long as
> persistent_huge_pages() is above a calculated min_count value.
> However, this loop can conditionally drop hugetlb_lock and in some
> circumstances free_pool_huge_page can drop hugetlb_lock.  If the
> lock is dropped, counters could change the calculated min_count
> value may no longer be valid.

OK, this one looks like a real bug fix introduced by 55f67141a8927.
Unless I am missing something we could release pages which are reserved
already.
 
> The routine try_to_free_low has the same issue.
> 
> Recalculate min_count in each loop iteration as hugetlb_lock may have
> been dropped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index d5be25f910e8..c537274c2a38 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2521,11 +2521,20 @@ static void __init report_hugepages(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static inline unsigned long min_hp_count(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count)
> +{
> +	unsigned long min_count;
> +
> +	min_count = h->resv_huge_pages + h->nr_huge_pages - h->free_huge_pages;
> +	return max(count, min_count);

Just out of curiousity, is compiler allowed to inline this piece of code
and then cache the value? In other words do we need to make these
READ_ONCE or otherwise enforce the no-caching behavior?

> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
>  static void try_to_free_low(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
>  						nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
>  {
>  	int i;
> +	unsigned long min_count = min_hp_count(h, count);
>  
>  	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
>  		return;
> @@ -2534,7 +2543,7 @@ static void try_to_free_low(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
>  		struct page *page, *next;
>  		struct list_head *freel = &h->hugepage_freelists[i];
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, freel, lru) {
> -			if (count >= h->nr_huge_pages)
> +			if (min_count >= h->nr_huge_pages)
>  				return;
>  			if (PageHighMem(page))
>  				continue;
> @@ -2542,6 +2551,12 @@ static void try_to_free_low(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
>  			update_and_free_page(h, page);
>  			h->free_huge_pages--;
>  			h->free_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]--;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * update_and_free_page could have dropped lock so
> +			 * recompute min_count.
> +			 */
> +			min_count = min_hp_count(h, count);
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -2695,13 +2710,15 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
>  	 * and won't grow the pool anywhere else. Not until one of the
>  	 * sysctls are changed, or the surplus pages go out of use.
>  	 */
> -	min_count = h->resv_huge_pages + h->nr_huge_pages - h->free_huge_pages;
> -	min_count = max(count, min_count);
> -	try_to_free_low(h, min_count, nodes_allowed);
> +	min_count = min_hp_count(h, count);
> +	try_to_free_low(h, count, nodes_allowed);
>  	while (min_count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
>  		if (!free_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed, 0))
>  			break;
>  		cond_resched_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +		/* Recompute min_count in case hugetlb_lock was dropped */
> +		min_count = min_hp_count(h, count);
>  	}
>  	while (count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
>  		if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, 1))
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux