On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:18:42 +0000 Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This series is based on top of Matthew Wilcox's series "Rationalise > __alloc_pages wrapper" and does not apply to 5.12-rc2. If you want to > test and are not using Andrew's tree as a baseline, I suggest using the > following git tree > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux.git mm-bulk-rebase-v5r9 page_bench04_bulk[1] micro-benchmark on branch: mm-bulk-rebase-v5r9 [1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/mm/bench/page_bench04_bulk.c BASELINE single_page alloc+put: Per elem: 199 cycles(tsc) 55.472 ns LIST variant: time_bulk_page_alloc_free_list: step=bulk size Per elem: 206 cycles(tsc) 57.478 ns (step:1) Per elem: 154 cycles(tsc) 42.861 ns (step:2) Per elem: 145 cycles(tsc) 40.536 ns (step:3) Per elem: 142 cycles(tsc) 39.477 ns (step:4) Per elem: 142 cycles(tsc) 39.610 ns (step:8) Per elem: 137 cycles(tsc) 38.155 ns (step:16) Per elem: 135 cycles(tsc) 37.739 ns (step:32) Per elem: 134 cycles(tsc) 37.282 ns (step:64) Per elem: 133 cycles(tsc) 36.993 ns (step:128) ARRAY variant: time_bulk_page_alloc_free_array: step=bulk size Per elem: 202 cycles(tsc) 56.383 ns (step:1) Per elem: 144 cycles(tsc) 40.047 ns (step:2) Per elem: 134 cycles(tsc) 37.339 ns (step:3) Per elem: 128 cycles(tsc) 35.578 ns (step:4) Per elem: 120 cycles(tsc) 33.592 ns (step:8) Per elem: 116 cycles(tsc) 32.362 ns (step:16) Per elem: 113 cycles(tsc) 31.476 ns (step:32) Per elem: 110 cycles(tsc) 30.633 ns (step:64) Per elem: 110 cycles(tsc) 30.596 ns (step:128) Compared to the previous results (see below) list-variant got faster, but array-variant is still faster. The array variant lost a little performance. I think this can be related to the stats counters got added/moved inside the loop, in this patchset. Previous results from: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210319181031.44dd3113@carbon/ On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:10:31 +0100 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BASELINE > single_page alloc+put: 207 cycles(tsc) 57.773 ns > > LIST variant: time_bulk_page_alloc_free_list: step=bulk size > > Per elem: 294 cycles(tsc) 81.866 ns (step:1) > Per elem: 214 cycles(tsc) 59.477 ns (step:2) > Per elem: 199 cycles(tsc) 55.504 ns (step:3) > Per elem: 192 cycles(tsc) 53.489 ns (step:4) > Per elem: 188 cycles(tsc) 52.456 ns (step:8) > Per elem: 184 cycles(tsc) 51.346 ns (step:16) > Per elem: 183 cycles(tsc) 50.883 ns (step:32) > Per elem: 184 cycles(tsc) 51.236 ns (step:64) > Per elem: 189 cycles(tsc) 52.620 ns (step:128) > > ARRAY variant: time_bulk_page_alloc_free_array: step=bulk size > > Per elem: 195 cycles(tsc) 54.174 ns (step:1) > Per elem: 123 cycles(tsc) 34.224 ns (step:2) > Per elem: 113 cycles(tsc) 31.430 ns (step:3) > Per elem: 108 cycles(tsc) 30.003 ns (step:4) > Per elem: 102 cycles(tsc) 28.417 ns (step:8) > Per elem: 98 cycles(tsc) 27.475 ns (step:16) > Per elem: 96 cycles(tsc) 26.901 ns (step:32) > Per elem: 95 cycles(tsc) 26.487 ns (step:64) > Per elem: 94 cycles(tsc) 26.170 ns (step:128) > The users of the API have been dropped in this version as the callers > need to check whether they prefer an array or list interface (whether > preference is based on convenience or performance). I'll start coding up the page_pool API user and benchmark that. > Changelog since v4 > o Drop users of the API > o Remove free_pages_bulk interface, no users In [1] benchmark I just open-coded free_pages_bulk(): https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/commit/49d224b19850b767c > o Add array interface > o Allocate single page if watermark checks on local zones fail -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
