19.03.2021 20:41, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 19.03.2021 20:29, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>> +void cma_sysfs_alloc_pages_count(struct cma *cma, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + atomic64_add(count, &cma->nr_pages_succeeded);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void cma_sysfs_fail_pages_count(struct cma *cma, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + atomic64_add(count, &cma->nr_pages_failed);
>> +}
>
> The atomic looks good, but aren't CMA allocations already protected by
> the CMA core? Do we really need to worry about racing here?
>
Although, please scratch that. I see now that these functions are called
outside of the lock.
