On 3/12/21 6:49 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Hi:
> On 2021/3/13 4:03, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 3/8/21 3:28 AM, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> The fault_mutex hashing overhead can be avoided in truncate_op case because
>>> page faults can not race with truncation in this routine. So calculate hash
>>> for fault_mutex only in !truncate_op case to save some cpu cycles.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>> index c262566f7c5d..d81f52b87bd7 100644
>>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>> @@ -482,10 +482,9 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); ++i) {
>>> struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
>>> - u32 hash;
>>> + u32 hash = 0;
>>
>> Do we need to initialize hash here?
>> I would not bring this up normally, but the purpose of the patch is to save
>> cpu cycles.
>
> The hash is initialized here in order to avoid false positive
> "uninitialized local variable used" warning. Or this is indeed unnecessary?
>
Of course. In this case we know more about usage then the compiler.
You can add:
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Mike Kravetz
