From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
In shrink_node(), to determine whether to enable cache trim mode, the
LRU size is gotten via lruvec_page_state(). That gets the value from
a per-CPU counter (mem_cgroup_per_node->lruvec_stat[]). The error of
the per-CPU counter from CPU local counting and the descendant memory
cgroups may cause some issues. We run into this in 0-Day performance
test.
0-Day uses the RAM file system as root file system, so the number of
the reclaimable file pages is very small. In the swap testing, the
inactive file LRU list will become almost empty soon. But the size of
the inactive file LRU list gotten from the per-CPU counter may keep a
much larger value (say, 33, 50, etc.). This will enable cache trim
mode, but nothing can be scanned in fact. The following pattern
repeats for long time in the test,
priority inactive_file_size cache_trim_mode
12 33 0
11 33 0
...
6 33 0
5 33 1
...
1 33 1
That is, the cache_trim_mode will be enabled wrongly when the scan
priority decreases to 5. And the problem will not be recovered for
long time.
It's hard to get the more accurate size of the inactive file list
without much more overhead. And it's hard to estimate the error of
the per-CPU counter too, because there may be many descendant memory
cgroups. But after the actual scanning, if nothing can be scanned
with the cache trim mode, it should be wrong to enable the cache trim
mode. So we can retry with the cache trim mode disabled. This patch
implement this policy.
The test results for pmbench with normal access address distribution
and 2 NVMe disks as swap on a Intel server for the base and patched
kernel are as follows.
base change patched
---------- ------ ---------
122100000 18.6% 144800000 pmbench.throughput.aps
164078 -56.3% 71686 vmstat.swap.si
166511 -20.8% 131957 vmstat.swap.so
1992 -52.2% 953.17 proc-vmstat.kswapd_high_wmark_hit_quickly
230.20 -63.8% 83.33 proc-vmstat.kswapd_low_wmark_hit_quickly
2318 -41.4% 1358 proc-vmstat.pageoutrun
>From the above table, with the patch, the page reclaiming algorithm
runs more smoothly, the hot/cold pages distinguishing works better, so
the swap in/out throughput decreases considerably, and the benchmark
throughput increases 18.6%.
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index fea6b43bc1f9..1304e3c98a14 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2606,7 +2606,8 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction;
}
-static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
+static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc,
+ bool skip_slab)
{
struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
@@ -2652,8 +2653,9 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
- shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
- sc->priority);
+ if (!skip_slab)
+ shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
+ sc->priority);
/* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
@@ -2669,6 +2671,7 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
struct lruvec *target_lruvec;
bool reclaimable = false;
+ bool skip_slab;
unsigned long file;
target_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(sc->target_mem_cgroup, pgdat);
@@ -2767,7 +2770,15 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
anon >> sc->priority;
}
- shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
+ skip_slab = false;
+retry:
+ shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc, skip_slab);
+ /* Nothing can be scanned with cache trim mode, retry without it */
+ if (sc->cache_trim_mode && sc->nr_scanned == nr_scanned) {
+ sc->cache_trim_mode = 0;
+ skip_slab = true;
+ goto retry;
+ }
if (reclaim_state) {
sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
--
2.30.1
