On 3/9/21 11:18 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:39:41AM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:04 AM Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> in_interrupt() check in memcg_kmem_bypass() is incorrect because >>> it does not allow to account memory allocation called from task context >>> with disabled BH, i.e. inside spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() sections >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> In that file in_interrupt() is used at other places too. Should we >> change those too? > > Yes, it seems so. Let me prepare a fix (it seems like most of them were > introduced by me). No objects from my side, just keep me informed and add me in "Reported-by:" in your patches. Thank you, Vasily Averin
