On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:04:05PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > When racing between putback_lru_page and shmem_unlock happens, >> >> s/shmem_unlock/shmem_lock/ > > I did it intentionally for represent shmem_lock with user = 1, lock = 0. > If you think it makes others confusing, I will change in next version. > Thanks. I was confused. Now I understand. > >> >> > progrom execution order is as follows, but clear_bit in processor #1 >> > could be reordered right before spin_unlock of processor #1. >> > Then, the page would be stranded on the unevictable list. > > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>