On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 15:47 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, David Rientjes wrote: > > It'll turn into another one of our infinite number of capabilities. Does > > anything actually care about statistics at KB granularity these days? > > Changing that to MB may also break things. It may be better to have > consistent system for access control to memory management counters that > are not related to a process. We could also just _effectively_ make it output in MB: foo = foo & ~(1<<20) or align-up. We could also give the imprecise numbers to unprivileged users and let privileged ones see the page-level ones. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>