Re: [PATCH 6/9] kstaled: rate limit pages scanned per second.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:13 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:49:04 -0700
> Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Scan some number of pages from each node every second, instead of trying to
>> scan the entime memory at once and being idle for the rest of the configured
>> interval.
>>
>> In addition to spreading the CPU usage over the entire scanning interval,
>> this also reduces the jitter between two consecutive scans of the same page.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Does this scan thread need to be signle thread ?

It tends to perform worse if we try making it multithreaded. What
happens is that the scanning threads call page_referenced() a lot, and
if they both try scanning pages that belong to the same file that
causes the mapping's i_mmap_mutex lock to bounce. Same things happens
if they try scanning pages that belong to the same anon VMA too.

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]