Re: [patch 1/2]vmscan: correct all_unreclaimable for zone without lru pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 14:57 +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > I saw DMA zone always has ->all_unreclaimable set. The reason is the high zones
> > are big, so zone_watermark_ok/_safe() will always return false with a high
> > classzone_idx for DMA zone, because DMA zone's lowmem_reserve is big for a high
> > classzone_idx. When kswapd runs into DMA zone, it doesn't scan/reclaim any
> > pages(no pages in lru), but mark the zone as all_unreclaimable. This can
> > happen in other low zones too.
> 
> Good catch!
> 
> > This is confusing and can potentially cause oom. Say a low zone has
> > all_unreclaimable when high zone hasn't enough memory. Then allocating
> > some pages in low zone(for example reading blkdev with highmem support),
> > then run into direct reclaim. Since the zone has all_unreclaimable set,
> > direct reclaim might reclaim nothing and an oom reported. If
> > all_unreclaimable is unset, the zone can actually reclaim some pages.
> > If all_unreclaimable is unset, in the inner loop of balance_pgdat we always have
> > all_zones_ok 0 when checking a low zone's watermark. If high zone watermark isn't
> > good, there is no problem. Otherwise, we might loop one more time in the outer
> > loop, but since high zone watermark is ok, the end_zone will be lower, then low
> > zone's watermark check will be ok and the outer loop will break. So looks this
> > doesn't bring any problem.
> 
> I think it would be better to correct zone_reclaimable.
> My point is zone_reclaimable should consider zone->pages_scanned.
> The point of the function is how many pages scanned VS how many pages remained in LRU.
> If reclaimer doesn't scan the zone at all because of no lru pages, it shouldn't tell
> the zone is all_unreclaimable.
actually this is exact my first version of the patch. The problem is if
a zone is true unreclaimable (used by kenrel pages or whatever), we will
have zone->pages_scanned 0 too. I thought we should set
all_unreclaimable in this case.

Thanks,
Shaohua

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]