On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 04:41:07PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:52:42AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:02:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Should we rename determine_dirtyable_memory() to > > > global_dirtyable_memory(), to get some sense of its relationship with > > > zone_dirtyable_memory()? > > > > Sounds good. > > --- > > The next patch will introduce per-zone dirty limiting functions in > addition to the traditional global dirty limiting. > > Rename determine_dirtyable_memory() to global_dirtyable_memory() > before adding the zone-specific version, and fix up its documentation. > > Also, move the functions to determine the dirtyable memory and the > function to calculate the dirty limit based on that together so that > their relationship is more apparent and that they can be commented on > as a group. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> -- Kinds regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>