On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:59:06PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 24.02.21 16:39, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > There could be struct pages that are not backed by actual physical memory. > > This can happen when the actual memory bank is not a multiple of > > SECTION_SIZE or when an architecture does not register memory holes > > reserved by the firmware as memblock.memory. > > > > Such pages are currently initialized using init_unavailable_mem() function > > that iterates through PFNs in holes in memblock.memory and if there is a > > struct page corresponding to a PFN, the fields of this page are set to > > default values and it is marked as Reserved. > > > > init_unavailable_mem() does not take into account zone and node the page > > belongs to and sets both zone and node links in struct page to zero. > > > > Before commit 73a6e474cb37 ("mm: memmap_init: iterate over memblock regions > > rather that check each PFN") the holes inside a zone were re-initialized > > during memmap_init() and got their zone/node links right. However, after > > that commit nothing updates the struct pages representing such holes. > > > > On a system that has firmware reserved holes in a zone above ZONE_DMA, for > > instance in a configuration below: > > > > # grep -A1 E820 /proc/iomem > > 7a17b000-7a216fff : Unknown E820 type > > 7a217000-7bffffff : System RAM > > > > unset zone link in struct page will trigger > > > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page); > > > > because there are pages in both ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_DMA (unset zone link > > in struct page) in the same pageblock. > > > > Interleave initialization of the unavailable pages with the normal > > initialization of memory map, so that zone and node information will be > > properly set on struct pages that are not backed by the actual memory. > > > > With this change the pages for holes inside a zone will get proper > > zone/node links and the pages that are not spanned by any node will get > > links to the adjacent zone/node. > > > > Fixes: 73a6e474cb37 ("mm: memmap_init: iterate over memblock regions rather that check each PFN") > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/page_alloc.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 3e93f8b29bae..a11a9acde708 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -6280,12 +6280,60 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone) > > } > > } > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP) > > +/* > > + * Only struct pages that correspond to ranges defined by memblock.memory > > + * are zeroed and initialized by going through __init_single_page() during > > + * memmap_init_zone(). > > + * > > + * But, there could be struct pages that correspond to holes in > > + * memblock.memory. This can happen because of the following reasons: > > + * - phyiscal memory bank size is not necessarily the exact multiple of the > > + * arbitrary section size > > + * - early reserved memory may not be listed in memblock.memory > > + * - memory layouts defined with memmap= kernel parameter may not align > > + * nicely with memmap sections > > + * > > + * Explicitly initialize those struct pages so that: > > + * - PG_Reserved is set > > + * - zone and node links point to zone and node that span the page > > + */ > > +static u64 __meminit init_unavailable_range(unsigned long spfn, > > + unsigned long epfn, > > + int zone, int node) > > +{ > > + unsigned long pfn; > > + u64 pgcnt = 0; > > + > > + for (pfn = spfn; pfn < epfn; pfn++) { > > + if (!pfn_valid(ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages))) { > > + pfn = ALIGN_DOWN(pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) > > + + pageblock_nr_pages - 1; > > + continue; > > + } > > + __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zone, node); > > + __SetPageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)); > > + pgcnt++; > > + } > > + > > + return pgcnt; > > +} > > +#else > > +static inline u64 init_unavailable_range(unsigned long spfn, unsigned long epfn, > > + int zone, int node) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > void __meminit __weak memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone) > > { > > unsigned long zone_start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; > > unsigned long zone_end_pfn = zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages; > > int i, nid = zone_to_nid(zone), zone_id = zone_idx(zone); > > + static unsigned long hole_pfn = 0; > > unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; > > + u64 pgcnt = 0; > > for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) { > > start_pfn = clamp(start_pfn, zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn); > > @@ -6295,7 +6343,23 @@ void __meminit __weak memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone) > > memmap_init_range(end_pfn - start_pfn, nid, > > zone_id, start_pfn, zone_end_pfn, > > MEMINIT_EARLY, NULL, MIGRATE_MOVABLE); > > + > > + if (hole_pfn < start_pfn) > > + pgcnt += init_unavailable_range(hole_pfn, start_pfn, > > + zone_id, nid); > > + hole_pfn = end_pfn; > > } > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM > > + end_pfn = round_up(zone_end_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION); > > + if (hole_pfn < end_pfn) > > + pgcnt += init_unavailable_range(hole_pfn, end_pfn, > > + zone_id, nid); > > We might still double-initialize PFNs when two zones overlap within a > section, correct? You mean that a section crosses zones boundary? I don't think it's that important. > This might worth documenting - also, you might want to > take some of the original comment the accompanied this code. The original comment was not exactly right, I believe the comment above init_unavailable_range() better describes what's going on there. > You should also document (in the patch description?) that node/zone spans > are not properly handled yet for such hole pfns and that this might require > care in the future. I think Link: will suffice for this. > I played a little with weird setups and expected the memap state using > page-types (well, I can't inspect the node/zone that way but at least have a > look if the memmap was initialized). No surprises. Great, thanks! -- Sincerely yours, Mike.