Re: [PATCH 1/2] oom: do not live lock on frozen tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:

> I guess you mean a situation when select_bad_process picks up a process
> which is not marked as frozen yet but we send SIGKILL right before
> schedule is called in refrigerator. 
> In that case either schedule should catch it by signal_pending_state
> check or we will pick it up next OOM round when we pick up the same
> process (if nothing else is eligible). Or am I missing something?
>  

That doesn't close the race, the oom killer will see the presence of an 
eligible TIF_MEMDIE thread in select_bad_process() and simply return to 
the page allocator.  You'd need to thaw it there as well and hope that 
nothing now or in the future will get into an endless thaw-freeze-thaw 
loop in the exit path.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]