On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:14 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Isn't good enough? Also, returning an rb_node just seems iffy.. > > yup this can be done. can you please elaborate on why passing back an > rb_node is an issue? Just seems ugly to me, why return a pointer inside the object the function name deals with. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href