On 2/18/21 2:27 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:13:52PM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 2/18/21 1:54 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
>>> It is a preparation work to be able to behave differently in the per
>>> architecture huge_pte_alloc() according to different VMA attributes.
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>> index ad4b42f04988..97e0824fdbe7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>>> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ unsigned long pmd_leaf_size(pmd_t pmd) { return 1UL << tte_to_shift(*(pte_t *)&p
>>> unsigned long pte_leaf_size(pte_t pte) { return 1UL << tte_to_shift(pte); }
>>>
>>> pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> +pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long addr, unsigned long sz)
>>> {
>>> pgd_t *pgd;
>>
>> Didn't kernel test robot report this build error on the first patch series?
>
> That seems to be irrelevant of this series:
>
> arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c:269:22: error: 'huge_tte_to_size' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> Thanks,
I thought the error was caused by not deleting the line
pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm,
when adding
pte_t *huge_pte_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
as above.
--
Mike Kravetz
