On Thu 18-02-21 10:43:21, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.02.21 10:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 18-02-21 10:02:43, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.02.21 09:56, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Wed 17-02-21 08:36:03, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > > alloc_contig_range is usually used on cma area or movable zone. > > > > > It's critical if the page migration fails on those areas so > > > > > dump more debugging message like memory_hotplug unless user > > > > > specifiy __GFP_NOWARN. > > > > > > > > I agree with David that this has a potential to generate a lot of output > > > > and it is not really clear whether it is worth it. Page isolation code > > > > already has REPORT_FAILURE mode which currently used only for the memory > > > > hotplug because this was just too noisy from the CMA path - d381c54760dc > > > > ("mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory"). > > > > > > > > Maybe migration failures are less likely to fail but still. > > > > > > Side note: I really dislike that uncontrolled error reporting on memory > > > offlining path we have enabled as default. Yeah, it might be useful for > > > ZONE_MOVABLE in some cases, but otherwise it's just noise. > > > > > > Just do a "sudo stress-ng --memhotplug 1" and see the log getting flooded > > > > Anyway we can discuss this in a separate thread but I think this is not > > a representative workload. > > Sure, but the essence is "this is noise", and we'll have more noise on > alloc_contig_range() as we see these calls more frequently. There should be > an explicit way to enable such *debug* messages. There is a dynamic debugging framework available. I do not have much of an exprience there but maybe that is the way to go. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs