Hi: On 2021/2/13 9:15, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On 2/9/21 11:54 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote: >> If there is no reservation corresponding to a vma, map_chg is always != 0, >> i.e. we can not meet the condition where a vma does not have reservation >> while map_chg = 0. > > This commit message might be easier to understand? > > vma_resv_map(vma) checks if a reserve map is associated with the vma. The > routine vma_needs_reservation() will check vma_resv_map(vma) and return 1 > if no reserv map is present. map_chg is set to the return value of > vma_needs_reservation(). Therefore, !vma_resv_map(vma) is redundant in the > expression: > map_chg || avoid_reserve || !vma_resv_map(vma); > Remove the redundant check. > Sorry for late respond! I will use this wonderful commit message. Many thanks! :)
