* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-09-26 16:19:51]:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > @@ -820,6 +821,19 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags)
> > mce_notify_process();
> > #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 && CONFIG_X86_MCE */
> >
> > + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) {
> > + clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> > + /*
> > + * On x86_32, do_notify_resume() gets called with
> > + * interrupts disabled. Hence enable interrupts if they
> > + * are still disabled.
> > + */
> > + local_irq_enable();
> > +#endif
> > + uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
> > + }
> > +
> > /* deal with pending signal delivery */
> > if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
> > do_signal(regs);
>
> It would be good to remove this difference between i386 and x86_64.
I think, we have already discussed this. I tried getting to know why we
have this difference in behaviour. However I havent been able to find
the answer.
If you can get somebody to answer this, I would be happy to modify as
required.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>