* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-09-26 16:19:51]: > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > @@ -820,6 +821,19 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags) > > mce_notify_process(); > > #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 && CONFIG_X86_MCE */ > > > > + if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_UPROBE) { > > + clear_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 > > + /* > > + * On x86_32, do_notify_resume() gets called with > > + * interrupts disabled. Hence enable interrupts if they > > + * are still disabled. > > + */ > > + local_irq_enable(); > > +#endif > > + uprobe_notify_resume(regs); > > + } > > + > > /* deal with pending signal delivery */ > > if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING) > > do_signal(regs); > > It would be good to remove this difference between i386 and x86_64. I think, we have already discussed this. I tried getting to know why we have this difference in behaviour. However I havent been able to find the answer. If you can get somebody to answer this, I would be happy to modify as required. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>