Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 12/26] Uprobes: Handle breakpoint and Singlestep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> 						Hence provide some extra
> + * time (by way of synchronize_sched() for breakpoint hit threads to acquire
> + * the uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the rbtree. 

'Some extra time' doesn't make me all warm an fuzzy inside, but instead
screams we fudge around a race condition.

ISTR raising this before ;-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]