On 2/12/21 4:01 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
no_hash_pointers ?I am fine with this. I am still a bit scared of a bikeshedng. But AFAIK, Mathew was most active on proposing clear names. So, when he is fine with this... Anyway, we should use the same name also for the variable.
Ok, unless there are any objections, I will change the parameter and variable to "no_hash_pointers" in v4, which I will send out later today.
I hope this patch set gets accepted for 5.12.
