Re: [PATCH 5/5] slub: Only IPI CPUs that have per cpu obj to flush

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:54 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
> AFAICT, flush_all() isn't all that performance sensitive. Why do we
> want to reduce IPIs here? 

Because it can wake up otherwise idle CPUs, wasting power. Or for the
case I care more about, unnecessarily perturb a CPU that didn't actually
have anything to flush but was running something, introducing jitter.

on_each_cpu() things are bad when you have a ton of CPUs (which is
pretty normal these days). 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]