Re: [PATCH v19 06/25] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:50:07AM -0800, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> I have not run into the situation.  Initially it was there because other
> faults have it.

Which other faults?

> When you asked, I went through it and put out my reasoning.

What does that mean?

> I think it still makes sense to keep it.

Because you have a hunch or you actually have an objective reason why?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux