From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> This commit adds kunit based unit tests for the core and the virtual address spaces monitoring primitives of DAMON. Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/damon/Kconfig | 36 +++++ mm/damon/core-test.h | 253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/damon/core.c | 7 + mm/damon/dbgfs-test.h | 214 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/damon/dbgfs.c | 2 + mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 328 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/damon/vaddr.c | 7 + 7 files changed, 847 insertions(+) create mode 100644 mm/damon/core-test.h create mode 100644 mm/damon/dbgfs-test.h create mode 100644 mm/damon/vaddr-test.h diff --git a/mm/damon/Kconfig b/mm/damon/Kconfig index 72f1683ba0ee..455995152697 100644 --- a/mm/damon/Kconfig +++ b/mm/damon/Kconfig @@ -12,6 +12,18 @@ config DAMON See https://damonitor.github.io/doc/html/latest-damon/index.html for more information. +config DAMON_KUNIT_TEST + bool "Test for damon" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on DAMON && KUNIT=y + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds the DAMON Kunit test suite. + + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer + to the KUnit documentation. + + If unsure, say N. + config DAMON_VADDR bool "Data access monitoring primitives for virtual address spaces" depends on DAMON && MMU @@ -21,6 +33,18 @@ config DAMON_VADDR This builds the default data access monitoring primitives for DAMON that works for virtual address spaces. +config DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST + bool "Test for DAMON primitives" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on DAMON_VADDR && KUNIT=y + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds the DAMON virtual addresses primitives Kunit test suite. + + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer + to the KUnit documentation. + + If unsure, say N. + config DAMON_DBGFS bool "DAMON debugfs interface" depends on DAMON_VADDR && DEBUG_FS @@ -30,4 +54,16 @@ config DAMON_DBGFS If unsure, say N. +config DAMON_DBGFS_KUNIT_TEST + bool "Test for damon debugfs interface" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on DAMON_DBGFS && KUNIT=y + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + This builds the DAMON debugfs interface Kunit test suite. + + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer + to the KUnit documentation. + + If unsure, say N. + endmenu diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b815dfbfb5fd --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests + * + * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. + * + * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> + */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_KUNIT_TEST + +#ifndef _DAMON_CORE_TEST_H +#define _DAMON_CORE_TEST_H + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +static void damon_test_regions(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_region *r; + struct damon_target *t; + + r = damon_new_region(1, 2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ul, r->ar.start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2ul, r->ar.end); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, r->nr_accesses); + + t = damon_new_target(42); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, damon_nr_regions(t)); + + damon_add_region(r, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1u, damon_nr_regions(t)); + + damon_del_region(r); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, damon_nr_regions(t)); + + damon_free_target(t); +} + +static unsigned int nr_damon_targets(struct damon_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct damon_target *t; + unsigned int nr_targets = 0; + + damon_for_each_target(t, ctx) + nr_targets++; + + return nr_targets; +} + +static void damon_test_target(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx(); + struct damon_target *t; + + t = damon_new_target(42); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 42ul, t->id); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_targets(c)); + + damon_add_target(c, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1u, nr_damon_targets(c)); + + damon_destroy_target(t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, nr_damon_targets(c)); + + damon_destroy_ctx(c); +} + +/* + * Test kdamond_reset_aggregated() + * + * DAMON checks access to each region and aggregates this information as the + * access frequency of each region. In detail, it increases '->nr_accesses' of + * regions that an access has confirmed. 'kdamond_reset_aggregated()' flushes + * the aggregated information ('->nr_accesses' of each regions) to the result + * buffer. As a result of the flushing, the '->nr_accesses' of regions are + * initialized to zero. + */ +static void damon_test_aggregate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *ctx = damon_new_ctx(); + unsigned long target_ids[] = {1, 2, 3}; + unsigned long saddr[][3] = {{10, 20, 30}, {5, 42, 49}, {13, 33, 55} }; + unsigned long eaddr[][3] = {{15, 27, 40}, {31, 45, 55}, {23, 44, 66} }; + unsigned long accesses[][3] = {{42, 95, 84}, {10, 20, 30}, {0, 1, 2} }; + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + int it, ir; + + damon_set_targets(ctx, target_ids, 3); + + it = 0; + damon_for_each_target(t, ctx) { + for (ir = 0; ir < 3; ir++) { + r = damon_new_region(saddr[it][ir], eaddr[it][ir]); + r->nr_accesses = accesses[it][ir]; + damon_add_region(r, t); + } + it++; + } + kdamond_reset_aggregated(ctx); + it = 0; + damon_for_each_target(t, ctx) { + ir = 0; + /* '->nr_accesses' should be zeroed */ + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, r->nr_accesses); + ir++; + } + /* regions should be preserved */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3, ir); + it++; + } + /* targets also should be preserved */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3, it); + + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx); +} + +static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx(); + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(0, 100); + damon_add_region(r, t); + damon_split_region_at(c, r, 25); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 25ul); + + r = damon_next_region(r); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 25ul); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 100ul); + + damon_free_target(t); + damon_destroy_ctx(c); +} + +static void damon_test_merge_two(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r, *r2, *r3; + int i; + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(0, 100); + r->nr_accesses = 10; + damon_add_region(r, t); + r2 = damon_new_region(100, 300); + r2->nr_accesses = 20; + damon_add_region(r2, t); + + damon_merge_two_regions(r, r2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 300ul); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->nr_accesses, 16u); + + i = 0; + damon_for_each_region(r3, t) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, r, r3); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1); + + damon_free_target(t); +} + +static struct damon_region *__nth_region_of(struct damon_target *t, int idx) +{ + struct damon_region *r; + unsigned int i = 0; + + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + if (i++ == idx) + return r; + } + + return NULL; +} + +static void damon_test_merge_regions_of(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + unsigned long sa[] = {0, 100, 114, 122, 130, 156, 170, 184}; + unsigned long ea[] = {100, 112, 122, 130, 156, 170, 184, 230}; + unsigned int nrs[] = {0, 0, 10, 10, 20, 30, 1, 2}; + + unsigned long saddrs[] = {0, 114, 130, 156, 170}; + unsigned long eaddrs[] = {112, 130, 156, 170, 230}; + int i; + + t = damon_new_target(42); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sa); i++) { + r = damon_new_region(sa[i], ea[i]); + r->nr_accesses = nrs[i]; + damon_add_region(r, t); + } + + damon_merge_regions_of(t, 9, 9999); + /* 0-112, 114-130, 130-156, 156-170 */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u); + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { + r = __nth_region_of(t, i); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, saddrs[i]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, eaddrs[i]); + } + damon_free_target(t); +} + +static void damon_test_split_regions_of(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx(); + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(0, 22); + damon_add_region(r, t); + damon_split_regions_of(c, t, 2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2u); + damon_free_target(t); + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(0, 220); + damon_add_region(r, t); + damon_split_regions_of(c, t, 4); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 4u); + damon_free_target(t); + damon_destroy_ctx(c); +} + +static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_target), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_regions), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_aggregate), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_at), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_merge_two), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_merge_regions_of), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_regions_of), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = { + .name = "damon", + .test_cases = damon_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite); + +#endif /* _DAMON_CORE_TEST_H */ + +#endif /* CONFIG_DAMON_KUNIT_TEST */ diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c index cad2b4cee39d..6bfb5d7d9142 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core.c +++ b/mm/damon/core.c @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS #include <trace/events/damon.h> +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_KUNIT_TEST +#undef DAMON_MIN_REGION +#define DAMON_MIN_REGION 1 +#endif + /* Get a random number in [l, r) */ #define damon_rand(l, r) (l + prandom_u32_max(r - l)) @@ -709,3 +714,5 @@ static int kdamond_fn(void *data) do_exit(0); } + +#include "core-test.h" diff --git a/mm/damon/dbgfs-test.h b/mm/damon/dbgfs-test.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ae6a23a95106 --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/damon/dbgfs-test.h @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * DAMON Debugfs Interface Unit Tests + * + * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> + */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_DBGFS_KUNIT_TEST + +#ifndef _DAMON_DBGFS_TEST_H +#define _DAMON_DBGFS_TEST_H + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +static void damon_dbgfs_test_str_to_target_ids(struct kunit *test) +{ + char *question; + unsigned long *answers; + unsigned long expected[] = {12, 35, 46}; + ssize_t nr_integers = 0, i; + + question = "123"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)1, nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 123ul, answers[0]); + kfree(answers); + + question = "123abc"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)1, nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 123ul, answers[0]); + kfree(answers); + + question = "a123"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)0, nr_integers); + kfree(answers); + + question = "12 35"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)2, nr_integers); + for (i = 0; i < nr_integers; i++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], answers[i]); + kfree(answers); + + question = "12 35 46"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)3, nr_integers); + for (i = 0; i < nr_integers; i++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], answers[i]); + kfree(answers); + + question = "12 35 abc 46"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)2, nr_integers); + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], answers[i]); + kfree(answers); + + question = ""; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)0, nr_integers); + kfree(answers); + + question = "\n"; + answers = str_to_target_ids(question, strnlen(question, 128), + &nr_integers); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (ssize_t)0, nr_integers); + kfree(answers); +} + +static void damon_dbgfs_test_set_targets(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *ctx = dbgfs_new_ctx(); + unsigned long ids[] = {1, 2, 3}; + char buf[64]; + + /* Make DAMON consider target id as plain number */ + ctx->primitive.target_valid = NULL; + ctx->primitive.cleanup = NULL; + + damon_set_targets(ctx, ids, 3); + sprint_target_ids(ctx, buf, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (char *)buf, "1 2 3\n"); + + damon_set_targets(ctx, NULL, 0); + sprint_target_ids(ctx, buf, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (char *)buf, "\n"); + + damon_set_targets(ctx, (unsigned long []){1, 2}, 2); + sprint_target_ids(ctx, buf, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (char *)buf, "1 2\n"); + + damon_set_targets(ctx, (unsigned long []){2}, 1); + sprint_target_ids(ctx, buf, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (char *)buf, "2\n"); + + damon_set_targets(ctx, NULL, 0); + sprint_target_ids(ctx, buf, 64); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (char *)buf, "\n"); + + dbgfs_destroy_ctx(ctx); +} + +static void damon_dbgfs_test_set_recording(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *ctx = dbgfs_new_ctx(); + struct dbgfs_recorder *rec = ctx->callback.private; + int err; + + err = dbgfs_set_recording(ctx, 42, "foo"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, -EINVAL); + dbgfs_set_recording(ctx, 4242, "foo.bar"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rec->rbuf_len, 4242u); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, rec->rfile_path, "foo.bar"); + dbgfs_set_recording(ctx, 424242, "foo"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rec->rbuf_len, 424242u); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, rec->rfile_path, "foo"); + + dbgfs_destroy_ctx(ctx); +} + +static void damon_dbgfs_test_write_rbuf(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *ctx = dbgfs_new_ctx(); + struct dbgfs_recorder *rec = ctx->callback.private; + char *data; + + dbgfs_set_recording(ctx, 4242, "damon.data"); + + data = "hello"; + dbgfs_write_rbuf(ctx, data, strnlen(data, 256)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rec->rbuf_offset, 5u); + + dbgfs_write_rbuf(ctx, data, 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rec->rbuf_offset, 5u); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (char *)rec->rbuf, data); + + dbgfs_destroy_ctx(ctx); +} + +/* + * Test dbgfs_after_aggregation() + * + * dbgfs sets dbgfs_after_aggregation() as aggregate callback. It stores the + * aggregated monitoring information ('->nr_accesses' of each regions) to the + * result buffer. + */ +static void damon_dbgfs_test_aggregate(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *ctx = dbgfs_new_ctx(); + struct dbgfs_recorder *rec = ctx->callback.private; + unsigned long target_ids[] = {1, 2, 3}; + unsigned long saddr[][3] = {{10, 20, 30}, {5, 42, 49}, {13, 33, 55} }; + unsigned long eaddr[][3] = {{15, 27, 40}, {31, 45, 55}, {23, 44, 66} }; + unsigned long accesses[][3] = {{42, 95, 84}, {10, 20, 30}, {0, 1, 2} }; + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + int it, ir; + ssize_t sz, sr, sp; + + /* Make DAMON consider target id as plain number */ + ctx->primitive.target_valid = NULL; + ctx->primitive.cleanup = NULL; + + dbgfs_set_recording(ctx, 4242, "damon.data"); + damon_set_targets(ctx, target_ids, 3); + + it = 0; + damon_for_each_target(t, ctx) { + for (ir = 0; ir < 3; ir++) { + r = damon_new_region(saddr[it][ir], eaddr[it][ir]); + r->nr_accesses = accesses[it][ir]; + damon_add_region(r, t); + } + it++; + } + dbgfs_after_aggregation(ctx); + + /* The aggregated information should be written in the buffer */ + sr = sizeof(r->ar.start) + sizeof(r->ar.end) + sizeof(r->nr_accesses); + sp = sizeof(t->id) + sizeof(unsigned int) + 3 * sr; + sz = sizeof(struct timespec64) + sizeof(unsigned int) + 3 * sp; + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (unsigned int)sz, rec->rbuf_offset); + + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx); +} + +static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(damon_dbgfs_test_str_to_target_ids), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_dbgfs_test_set_targets), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_dbgfs_test_set_recording), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_dbgfs_test_write_rbuf), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_dbgfs_test_aggregate), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = { + .name = "damon-dbgfs", + .test_cases = damon_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite); + +#endif /* _DAMON_TEST_H */ + +#endif /* CONFIG_DAMON_KUNIT_TEST */ diff --git a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c index 68edfd4d3b41..bd803f1f90e6 100644 --- a/mm/damon/dbgfs.c +++ b/mm/damon/dbgfs.c @@ -884,3 +884,5 @@ static int __init damon_dbgfs_init(void) } module_init(damon_dbgfs_init); + +#include "dbgfs-test.h" diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c9394e1d21d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h @@ -0,0 +1,328 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests + * + * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. + * + * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx> + */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST + +#ifndef _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H +#define _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +static void __link_vmas(struct vm_area_struct *vmas, ssize_t nr_vmas) +{ + int i, j; + unsigned long largest_gap, gap; + + if (!nr_vmas) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas - 1; i++) { + vmas[i].vm_next = &vmas[i + 1]; + + vmas[i].vm_rb.rb_left = NULL; + vmas[i].vm_rb.rb_right = &vmas[i + 1].vm_rb; + + largest_gap = 0; + for (j = i; j < nr_vmas; j++) { + if (j == 0) + continue; + gap = vmas[j].vm_start - vmas[j - 1].vm_end; + if (gap > largest_gap) + largest_gap = gap; + } + vmas[i].rb_subtree_gap = largest_gap; + } + vmas[i].vm_next = NULL; + vmas[i].vm_rb.rb_right = NULL; + vmas[i].rb_subtree_gap = 0; +} + +/* + * Test __damon_va_three_regions() function + * + * In case of virtual memory address spaces monitoring, DAMON converts the + * complex and dynamic memory mappings of each target task to three + * discontiguous regions which cover every mapped areas. However, the three + * regions should not include the two biggest unmapped areas in the original + * mapping, because the two biggest areas are normally the areas between 1) + * heap and the mmap()-ed regions, and 2) the mmap()-ed regions and stack. + * Because these two unmapped areas are very huge but obviously never accessed, + * covering the region is just a waste. + * + * '__damon_va_three_regions() receives an address space of a process. It + * first identifies the start of mappings, end of mappings, and the two biggest + * unmapped areas. After that, based on the information, it constructs the + * three regions and returns. For more detail, refer to the comment of + * 'damon_init_regions_of()' function definition in 'mm/damon.c' file. + * + * For example, suppose virtual address ranges of 10-20, 20-25, 200-210, + * 210-220, 300-305, and 307-330 (Other comments represent this mappings in + * more short form: 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330) of a process are + * mapped. To cover every mappings, the three regions should start with 10, + * and end with 305. The process also has three unmapped areas, 25-200, + * 220-300, and 305-307. Among those, 25-200 and 220-300 are the biggest two + * unmapped areas, and thus it should be converted to three regions of 10-25, + * 200-220, and 300-330. + */ +static void damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_addr_range regions[3] = {0,}; + /* 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330 */ + struct vm_area_struct vmas[] = { + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 10, .vm_end = 20}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 20, .vm_end = 25}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 200, .vm_end = 210}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 210, .vm_end = 220}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 300, .vm_end = 305}, + (struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 307, .vm_end = 330}, + }; + + __link_vmas(vmas, 6); + + __damon_va_three_regions(&vmas[0], regions); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10ul, regions[0].start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 25ul, regions[0].end); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 200ul, regions[1].start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 220ul, regions[1].end); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 300ul, regions[2].start); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 330ul, regions[2].end); +} + +static struct damon_region *__nth_region_of(struct damon_target *t, int idx) +{ + struct damon_region *r; + unsigned int i = 0; + + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + if (i++ == idx) + return r; + } + + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Test 'damon_va_apply_three_regions()' + * + * test kunit object + * regions an array containing start/end addresses of current + * monitoring target regions + * nr_regions the number of the addresses in 'regions' + * three_regions The three regions that need to be applied now + * expected start/end addresses of monitoring target regions that + * 'three_regions' are applied + * nr_expected the number of addresses in 'expected' + * + * The memory mapping of the target processes changes dynamically. To follow + * the change, DAMON periodically reads the mappings, simplifies it to the + * three regions, and updates the monitoring target regions to fit in the three + * regions. The update of current target regions is the role of + * 'damon_va_apply_three_regions()'. + * + * This test passes the given target regions and the new three regions that + * need to be applied to the function and check whether it updates the regions + * as expected. + */ +static void damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(struct kunit *test, + unsigned long *regions, int nr_regions, + struct damon_addr_range *three_regions, + unsigned long *expected, int nr_expected) +{ + struct damon_ctx *ctx = damon_new_ctx(); + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + int i; + + t = damon_new_target(42); + for (i = 0; i < nr_regions / 2; i++) { + r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]); + damon_add_region(r, t); + } + damon_add_target(ctx, t); + + damon_va_apply_three_regions(ctx, t, three_regions); + + for (i = 0; i < nr_expected / 2; i++) { + r = __nth_region_of(t, i); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, expected[i * 2]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, expected[i * 2 + 1]); + } + + damon_destroy_ctx(ctx); +} + +/* + * This function test most common case where the three big regions are only + * slightly changed. Target regions should adjust their boundary (10-20-30, + * 50-55, 70-80, 90-100) to fit with the new big regions or remove target + * regions (57-79) that now out of the three regions. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions1(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-27, 45-55, 73-104 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 45, .end = 55}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 73, .end = 104} }; + /* 5-20-27, 45-55, 73-80-90-104 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 45, 55, + 73, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +/* + * Test slightly bigger change. Similar to above, but the second big region + * now require two target regions (50-55, 57-59) to be removed. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions2(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-27, 56-57, 65-104 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 56, .end = 57}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} }; + /* 5-20-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 56, 57, + 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +/* + * Test a big change. The second big region has totally freed and mapped to + * different area (50-59 -> 61-63). The target regions which were in the old + * second big region (50-55-57-59) should be removed and new target region + * covering the second big region (61-63) should be created. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions3(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-27, 61-63, 65-104 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 61, .end = 63}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} }; + /* 5-20-27, 61-63, 65-80-90-104 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 61, 63, + 65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +/* + * Test another big change. Both of the second and third big regions (50-59 + * and 70-100) has totally freed and mapped to different area (30-32 and + * 65-68). The target regions which were in the old second and third big + * regions should now be removed and new target regions covering the new second + * and third big regions should be crated. + */ +static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */ + unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59, + 70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100}; + /* 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */ + struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = { + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 7}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 30, .end = 32}, + (struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 68} }; + /* expect 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */ + unsigned long expected[] = {5, 7, 30, 32, 65, 68}; + + damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions), + new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected)); +} + +static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx(); + struct damon_target *t; + struct damon_region *r; + unsigned long i; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(c, NULL, 5), -EINVAL); + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(0, 100); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(c, r, 0), -EINVAL); + + damon_add_region(r, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(c, r, 10), 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 10u); + + i = 0; + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, i++ * 10); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, i * 10); + } + damon_free_target(t); + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(5, 59); + damon_add_region(r, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(c, r, 5), 0); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u); + + i = 0; + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + if (i == 4) + break; + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i++); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 5 + 10 * i); + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 59ul); + damon_free_target(t); + + t = damon_new_target(42); + r = damon_new_region(5, 6); + damon_add_region(r, t); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(c, r, 2), -EINVAL); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u); + + damon_for_each_region(r, t) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5ul); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6ul); + } + damon_free_target(t); + damon_destroy_ctx(c); +} + +static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions1), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions2), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions3), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions4), + KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_evenly), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = { + .name = "damon-primitives", + .test_cases = damon_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite); + +#endif /* _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H */ + +#endif /* CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST */ diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c index a6bf234daae6..ebdb2ab7d681 100644 --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c @@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ #include <linux/sched/mm.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST +#undef DAMON_MIN_REGION +#define DAMON_MIN_REGION 1 +#endif + /* Get a random number in [l, r) */ #define damon_rand(l, r) (l + prandom_u32_max(r - l)) @@ -577,3 +582,5 @@ void damon_va_set_primitives(struct damon_ctx *ctx) ctx->primitive.target_valid = damon_va_target_valid; ctx->primitive.cleanup = damon_va_cleanup; } + +#include "vaddr-test.h" -- 2.17.1
