On 2/4/2021 11:56 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:55:24PM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
Shadow Stack provides protection against function return address
corruption. It is active when the processor supports it, the kernel has
CONFIG_X86_CET enabled, and the application is built for the feature.
This is only implemented for the 64-bit kernel. When it is enabled, legacy
non-Shadow Stack applications continue to work, but without protection.
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/Kconfig.assembler | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 21f851179ff0..074b3c0e6bf6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1951,6 +1951,28 @@ config X86_SGX
If unsure, say N.
+config ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK
+ def_bool n
+
+config X86_CET
+ prompt "Intel Control-flow protection for user-mode"
+ def_bool n
+ depends on X86_64
+ depends on AS_WRUSS
+ select ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS
+ select ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK
This seems backwards to me? Shouldn't 'config X86_64' do the 'select
ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK' and 'config X86_CET' do a 'depends on
ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK' instead?
I will change it. Thanks!
--
Yu-cheng
