Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 3/26] Uprobes: register/unregister probes.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-09-20 17:50:19]:

> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:30:22PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > +int register_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > +				struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> > +{
> > +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	inode = igrab(inode);
> > +	if (!inode || !consumer || consumer->next)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (offset > inode->i_size)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> > +	uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset);
> > +	if (!uprobe)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> The error returns above don't iput(inode).  And inode->i_mutex stays
> locked on this return.

Yes will fix this .. by clubbing the !uprobe with the next condition.
Thanks for pointing this.

> 
> > +void unregister_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> > +				struct uprobe_consumer *consumer)
> > +{
> > +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> > +
> > +	inode = igrab(inode);
> > +	if (!inode || !consumer)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (offset > inode->i_size)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> > +	if (!uprobe)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!del_consumer(uprobe, consumer)) {
> > +		put_uprobe(uprobe);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> 
> More returns that do not iput(inode).

Yes. will fix these too.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]