Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: remove a meaningless if statement in gigantic page initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02.02.21 11:12, yanfei.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gigantic page is a compound page and its order is more than 1.
Thus it must be available for hpage_pincount. Let's remove this
meaningless if statement.

Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/hugetlb.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index a3e4fa2c5e94..73d602f8c7e2 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1501,9 +1501,7 @@ static void prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
  		set_compound_head(p, page);
  	}
  	atomic_set(compound_mapcount_ptr(page), -1);
-
-	if (hpage_pincount_available(page))
-		atomic_set(compound_pincount_ptr(page), 0);
+	atomic_set(compound_pincount_ptr(page), 0);
  }
/*


I can spot similar handling in destroy_compound_gigantic_page(). If this is correct (which I think it is), we should tackle both occurrences at once.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux