This series fixes pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also improves
its performance for normal hotplug memory. While here, it also reorganizes
pfn_valid() on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. This series is based on v5.11-rc6.
Question - should pfn_section_valid() be tested both for boot and non boot
memory as well ?
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Changes in V2:
- Dropped pfn_valid() bifurcation based on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
- Used PFN_PHYS() and PHYS_PFN() instead of __pfn_to_phys() and __phys_to_pfn()
- Moved __pfn_to_section() inside #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM with a { } construct
Changes in V1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1611905986-20155-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx/
- Test pfn_section_valid() for non boot memory
Changes in RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1608621144-4001-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx/
Anshuman Khandual (2):
arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory
arm64/mm: Reorganize pfn_valid()
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
