On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:15 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 07:56:10PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > > - Before the patch, > > [ 6343.396602] Slab 0x000000004382e02b objects=33 used=3 fp=0x000000009ae06ffc flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head) > > > > - After the patch, > > [ 6871.296131] Slab 0x00000000c0e19a37 objects=33 used=3 fp=0x00000000c4902159 flags=0x17ffffc0010200(Node 0,Zone 2,Lastcpupid 0x1fffff,slab|head) > > I would suggest it will be easier to parse as: > > flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) > > That should alleviate the concerns about debugfs format change -- we've > never guaranteed that flag names won't change, and they now look enough > like flags that parsers shouldn't fall over them. Good suggestion! I will do it as you suggested in the next version. -- Thanks Yafang
