On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:12:11PM +0000, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> pool_page_reusable() is a leftover from pre-NUMA-aware times. For now,
> this function is just a redundant wrapper over page_is_pfmemalloc(),
> so inline it into its sole call site.
Why doesn't this want to use {dev_}page_is_reusable()?
