From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:39:07 -0800 > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:11:23 +0000 Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > + * dev_page_is_reserved - check whether a page can be reused for network Rx > > + * @page: the page to test > > + * > > + * A page shouldn't be considered for reusing/recycling if it was allocated > > + * under memory pressure or at a distant memory node. > > + * > > + * Returns true if this page should be returned to page allocator, false > > + * otherwise. > > + */ > > +static inline bool dev_page_is_reserved(const struct page *page) > > Am I the only one who feels like "reusable" is a better term than > "reserved". I thought about it, but this will need to inverse the conditions in most of the drivers. I decided to keep it as it is. I can redo if "reusable" is preferred. Regarding "no objectives to take patch 1 through net-next": patches 2-3 depend on it, so I can't put it in a separate series. Thanks, Al
