> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:27 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 08:41:34PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>> > Historically /proc/slabinfo has 0444 permissions and is accessible to
>> > the world. slabinfo contains rather private information related both to
>> > the kernel and userspace tasks. Depending on the situation, it might
>> > reveal either private information per se or information useful to make
>> > another targeted attack. Some examples of what can be learned by
>> > reading/watching for /proc/slabinfo entries:
>> > ...
>> > World readable slabinfo simplifies kernel developers' job of debugging
>> > kernel bugs (e.g. memleaks), but I believe it does more harm than
>> > benefits. For most users 0444 slabinfo is an unreasonable attack vector.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Haven't had any mass complaints about the 0400 in Ubuntu (sorry Dave!), so
>> I'm obviously for it.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks like the members of the previous slabinfo discussion don't object
> against the patch now and it got two other Reviewed-by responses. Can
> you merge it as-is or should I probably convince someone else?
We discussed this in March (google for 'Make /proc/slabinfo 0400') and
concluded that it's not worth it doesn't really protect from anything
and causes harm to developers.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href