On Tue 13-09-11 01:37:46, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:57:18PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> > while (1) {
> > - victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_memcg);
> > - if (victim == root_memcg) {
> > + victim = mem_cgroup_iter(root_memcg, victim, true);
> > + if (!victim) {
> > loop++;
> > /*
> > * We are not draining per cpu cached charges during
> > @@ -1689,10 +1644,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
> > * anything, it might because there are
> > * no reclaimable pages under this hierarchy
> > */
> > - if (!check_soft || !total) {
> > - css_put(&victim->css);
> > + if (!check_soft || !total)
> > break;
> > - }
> > /*
> > * We want to do more targeted reclaim.
> > * excess >> 2 is not to excessive so as to
> > @@ -1700,15 +1653,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg,
> > * coming back to reclaim from this cgroup
> > */
> > if (total >= (excess >> 2) ||
> > - (loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS)) {
> > - css_put(&victim->css);
> > + (loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_RECLAIM_LOOPS))
> > break;
> > - }
> > }
> > + continue;
>
> Souldn't we do
>
> victim = root_memcg;
>
> instead?
You want to save mem_cgroup_iter call?
Yes it will work... I am not sure it is really an improvement. If we
just continue we can rely on mem_cgroup_iter doing the right thing.
Assignment might be not that obvious. But I dunno.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>