On 09/17/2011 03:33 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:11:32PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:46:12PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
+int tcp_init_cgroup_fill(struct proto *prot, struct cgroup *cgrp,
+ struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
+{
+ prot->enter_memory_pressure = tcp_enter_memory_pressure;
+ prot->memory_allocated = memory_allocated_tcp;
+ prot->prot_mem = tcp_sysctl_mem;
+ prot->sockets_allocated = sockets_allocated_tcp;
+ prot->memory_pressure = memory_pressure_tcp;
No fancy formatting, please.
What's wrong with having fancy formatting? It's indeed easier to read
when members are assigned this way. It's always up to maintainer to
choose what he prefers, but I see nothing wrong in such style (if only it
doesn't break the style of the whole file).
Cyrill
I am in agreement with Cyrill, but I really, really don't care...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>