Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Allows ioctl PROVISION to execute before CREATE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/21/21 6:37 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:34:49AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:57:18AM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
Hi,

On 1/20/21 4:05 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
In function sgx_encl_create(), the logic of directly assigning
value to attributes_mask determines that the call to
SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION must be after the command of
SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE. If change this assignment statement to
or operation, the PROVISION command can be executed earlier and
more flexibly.

Reported-by: Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
index f45957c05f69..0ca3fc238bc2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int sgx_encl_create(struct sgx_encl *encl, struct sgx_secs *secs)
   	encl->base = secs->base;
   	encl->size = secs->size;
   	encl->attributes = secs->attributes;
-	encl->attributes_mask = SGX_ATTR_DEBUG | SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT | SGX_ATTR_KSS;
+	encl->attributes_mask |= SGX_ATTR_DEBUG | SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT | SGX_ATTR_KSS;

Alternatively, move the existing code to sgx_open()?  Initializing the field
when the encl object is allocated feels more correct.



This seems like a good idea. Thanks for your suggestion. I have sent v2
patch, include the next two patches.

Did you ask from Sean about suggested-by's? Now it looks like
that doing these patches were originally proposed by Sean.

Please do not add tags from people *unauthentically*. I do not
see anything from Sean to any of the patches that would suggest
adding those tags. You are basically just stamping that to all
patches, which he has given a code review. Can you stop doing
this?

/Jarkko


I am very sorry for the trouble caused to you, I have made improvements in the new patch, thanks for your suggestions.

Best regards,
Tianjia




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux