On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:41 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 20:41 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > @@ -4584,7 +4584,8 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabstats_operations = {
> >
> > static int __init slab_proc_init(void)
> > {
> > - proc_create("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
> > + proc_create("slabinfo", S_IWUSR | S_IRUSR, NULL,
> > + &proc_slabinfo_operations);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK
> > proc_create("slab_allocators", 0, NULL, &proc_sla
>
> If you respin this, please don't muck with the whitespace.
OK, I was just removing checkpatch warnings.
> Otherwise,
> I'm fine with this. Distros are already starting to do this anyway in
> userspace.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you!
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>