Re: [PATCH v2] mm/hugetlb: avoid unnecessary hugetlb_acct_memory() call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi:

On 2021/1/15 17:28, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:20:13AM -0500, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> When gbl_reserve is 0, hugetlb_acct_memory() will do nothing except holding
>> and releasing hugetlb_lock. We should avoid this unnecessary hugetlb_lock
>> lock/unlock cycle which is happening on 'most' hugetlb munmap operations by
>> check delta against 0 at the beginning of hugetlb_acct_memory.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I would avoid mentioning gbl_reserve as not all callers use it, and focus
> on what delta means:
> 
> "When reservation accounting remains unchanged..", but anyway:

Sounds good. Maybe Andrew could kindly do this if this patch is picked up ?

> 
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
> 
> 

Many thanks for your review.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux