Re: [PATCH] mm: Free unused swap cache page in write protection fault handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:24 PM huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Couldn't we just move it to the tail of the LRU list so it's reclaimed
>> > first?  Or is locking going to be a problem here?
>>
>> Yes.  That's a way to reduce the disturbance to the page reclaiming.
>> For LRU lock contention, is it sufficient to use another pagevec?
>
> I wonder if this is really worth it. I'd like to see numbers.
>
> Because in probably 99%+ of all cases, that LRU dance is only going to
> hurt and add extra locking overhead and dirty caches.
>
> So I'd like to see some numbers that it actually helps measurably in
> whatever paging-heavy case...

OK.  I will start from a simpler version and only use a pagevec if
there's measurable difference.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux