On 2021-01-14 17:29:37 [+0100], Vitaly Wool wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2021, 17:18 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior, > <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2020-12-23 19:25:02 [+0100], Vitaly Wool wrote: > > > > write the following patch according to your idea, what do you think ? > > > > > > Yep, that is basically what I was thinking of. Some nitpicks below: > > > > Did this go somewhere? The thread just ends here on my end. > > Mike, is this patch fixing / helping your case in anyway? > > Please see > * https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=160889419514019&w=2 > * https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=160889418114011&w=2 > * https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=160889448814057&w=2 Thank you, that would be 1608894171-54174-1-git-send-email-tiantao6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx for b4 compatibility :) > Haven't had time to test these yet but seem to be alright. So zs_map_object() still disables preemption but the mutex part is avoided by the patch? > Best regards, > Vitaly Sebastian
