On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 06:54:30PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> I think this approach may be only suitable for generic huge page only.
> So we can implement it only for huge page.
>
> Hi Oscar,
>
> What's your opinion about this?
I tried something like:
static void vmemmap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end,
struct vmemmap_remap_walk *walk)
{
pte_t *pte;
pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
if (!walk->reuse_page) {
BUG_ON(pte_none(*pte));
walk->reuse_page = pte_page(*pte++);
addr = walk->remap_start;
}
for (; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
BUG_ON(pte_none(*pte));
walk->remap_pte(pte, addr, walk);
}
}
void vmemmap_remap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
unsigned long reuse)
{
LIST_HEAD(vmemmap_pages);
struct vmemmap_remap_walk walk = {
.remap_pte = vmemmap_remap_pte,
.reuse_addr = reuse,
.remap_start = start,
.vmemmap_pages = &vmemmap_pages,
};
BUG_ON(start != reuse + PAGE_SIZE);
vmemmap_remap_range(reuse, end, &walk);
free_vmemmap_page_list(&vmemmap_pages);
}
but it might overcomplicate things and I am not sure it is any better.
So I am fine with keeping it as is.
Should another user come in the future, we can always revisit.
Maybe just add a little comment in vmemmap_pte_range(), explaining while we
are "+= PAGE_SIZE" for address and I would like to see a comment in
vmemmap_remap_free why the BUG_ON and more important what it is checking.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
