On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:15:50PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > I confess I haven't investigated this direction at > all yet. Is it correct that your previous objection was > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-10/msg00455.html > and the direct-IO patchset you were thinking of was > http://copilotco.com/mail-archives/linux-kernel.2009/msg87176.html ? Yes. > If so, are you suggesting that instead of swap_readpage and > swap_writepage I look into what is required for swap to use ->readpage > method and ->direct_IO aops? The equivalent of ->direct_IO should be used for both reads and writes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>