On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:12:47AM +0100, Jann Horn wrote: > [This is not something I intend to work on myself. But since I > stumbled over this issue, I figured I should at least document/report > it, in case anyone is willing to pick it up.] Hi, Jann! Thank you very much for this report! It should be less of a problem since 5.9, but still on a machine with many CPUs a non-trivial amount of memory is wasted. I'll definitely take a look. Thanks!
