On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Alex,Shi wrote: > BTW, some testing results for your PCP SLUB: > > for hackbench process testing: > on WSM-EP, inc ~60%, NHM-EP inc ~25% > on NHM-EX, inc ~200%, core2-EP, inc ~250%. > on Tigerton-EX, inc 1900%, :) There is no minus on tigerton. I hope that is not a regression? > > for hackbench thread testing: > on WSM-EP, no clear inc, NHM-EP no clear inc > on NHM-EX, inc 10%, core2-EP, inc ~20%. > on Tigertion-EX, inc 100%, > for netperf loopback testing, no clear performance change. Hmmm... The sizes of the per cpu partial objects could be varied a bit to see if more would make an impact. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>