Re: [PATCH 02/10] blk: Introduce ->corrupted_range() for block device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:55:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> It happens on a dax_device.  We should not interwind dax and block_device
> even more after a lot of good work has happened to detangle them.

I agree that the dax device should not be implied from the block device,
but what happens if regular block device drivers grow the ability to
(say) perform a background integrity scan and want to ->corrupted_range?

--D




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux