Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: hugetlb: add return -EAGAIN for dissolve_free_huge_page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 06-01-21 16:47:37, Muchun Song wrote:
> When dissolve_free_huge_page() races with __free_huge_page(), we can
> do a retry. Because the race window is small.

Is this a bug fix or mere optimization. I have hard time to tell from
the description.
 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
[...]
> @@ -1825,6 +1828,14 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>  	}
>  out:
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the freeing of the HugeTLB page is put on a work queue, we should
> +	 * flush the work before retrying.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(rc == -EAGAIN))
> +		flush_work(&free_hpage_work);

Is it safe to wait for the work to finish from this context?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux