Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: readahead: handle LARGE input to get_init_ra_size()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/23/20 2:50 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
What motivates this change?  Is there any reason to think this can
happen?
Spotted in the wild:
I run 2 hardened Gentoo systems, a server and a desktop.

I patched the server with this:

mr-fox ~ # cat ubsan.patch
--- linux-5.10.1.orig/mm/readahead.c
+++ linux-5.10.1/mm/readahead.c
@@ -310,7 +310,11 @@ void force_page_cache_ra(struct readahea
  */
 static unsigned long get_init_ra_size(unsigned long size, unsigned
long max)
 {
-       unsigned long newsize = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
+       unsigned long newsize;
+
+       if (!size)
+               size = 32;
+       newsize = roundup_pow_of_two(size);

        if (newsize <= max / 32)
                newsize = newsize * 4;



and the issue did no longer occurred at the server (5.10.2).

I did not patched the desktop system and the issue occurred still 3
times since 21th of december (5.10.2/3)

--
Toralf





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux