On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:44:26AM +0800, Ruan Shiyang wrote: > > > On 2020/12/17 上午4:55, Jane Chu wrote: > > Hi, Shiyang, > > > > On 12/15/2020 4:14 AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote: > > > The call trace is like this: > > > memory_failure() > > > pgmap->ops->memory_failure() => pmem_pgmap_memory_failure() > > > gendisk->fops->corrupted_range() => - pmem_corrupted_range() > > > - md_blk_corrupted_range() > > > sb->s_ops->currupted_range() => xfs_fs_corrupted_range() > > > xfs_rmap_query_range() > > > xfs_currupt_helper() > > > * corrupted on metadata > > > try to recover data, call xfs_force_shutdown() > > > * corrupted on file data > > > try to recover data, call mf_dax_mapping_kill_procs() > > > > > > The fsdax & reflink support for XFS is not contained in this patchset. > > > > > > (Rebased on v5.10) > > > > So I tried the patchset with pmem error injection, the SIGBUS payload > > does not look right - > > > > ** SIGBUS(7): ** > > ** si_addr(0x(nil)), si_lsb(0xC), si_code(0x4, BUS_MCEERR_AR) ** > > > > I expect the payload looks like > > > > ** si_addr(0x7f3672e00000), si_lsb(0x15), si_code(0x4, BUS_MCEERR_AR) ** > > Thanks for testing. I test the SIGBUS by writing a program which calls > madvise(... ,MADV_HWPOISON) to inject memory-failure. It just shows that > the program is killed by SIGBUS. I cannot get any detail from it. So, > could you please show me the right way(test tools) to test it? I'm assuming that Jane is using a program that calls sigaction to install a SIGBUS handler, and dumps the entire siginfo_t structure whenever it receives one... --D > > -- > Thanks, > Ruan Shiyang. > > > > > thanks, > > -jane > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
